On CNN’s “Scenario Room” broadcast on Thursday, White Home Nationwide Safety Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby responded to US forces going through extra assaults from Iranian proxy teams within the wake of US strikes on Wednesday, saying that “It is not unusual after we do a retaliatory strike for there to be some type of secondary strikes by these proxy teams. We’ve not seen them very efficient. That does not imply we take it frivolously or that we undermine it in any respect. And clearly we’ll proceed to do what we’ve got to do.” To guard our forces in Iraq and Syria.

Host Wolf Blitzer requested: “As you understand, the US struck Iranian weapons in Syria final evening in response to assaults on American forces. However since then, US forces have already been focused in 4 different assaults. So, are these US retaliatory strikes actually profitable?

“It is not unusual after we do a retaliatory strike to have some type of secondary strikes by these proxy teams,” Kirby responded. “We’ve not seen them very efficient. That does not imply we take it frivolously or that we undermine it in any respect. And clearly we will proceed to do what we do.” We’ve to do it to guard our forces in Iraq and Syria. You heard the president speaking about that at the moment. Look, these proxy teams and the IRGC, which helps them, which sources them, trains them, funds them, offers them these capabilities, they’ve a option to make. We’ve proven that we’ll “What we have to do to guard our forces in Iraq and Syria. We are going to proceed to do it. If they need extra responses from the US army, they should cope with the results if they will proceed the strikes.”